Direct identification of bacteria from positive blood culture bottles by VITEK-MS: evaluation of two lysis-centrifugation methods

Authors

  • Abdul Rehman Chughtai Institute of Pathology, Lahore
  • Irim Iftikhar Chughtai Institute of Pathology, Lahore
  • Hijab Batool Chughtai Institute of Pathology, Lahore
  • Karam Rasool Chughtai Institute of Pathology, Lahore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61529/idjp.v35i3.482

Abstract

Background: Bloodstream infections cause significant global morbidity and mortality, and although MALDI-TOF MS accelerates pathogen identification, it still requires subculture. This study evaluated two in-house lysis-centrifugation methods (LCMs) using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and Triton X-100 for direct pathogen identification from positive blood culture bottles. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of SDS- and Triton X-100-based LCMs for direct bacterial identification from positive blood culture bottles using VITEK MS.

Material and Method: This study was conducted at the Chughtai Institute of Pathology, Lahore. Positive blood culture bottles were analyzed using the standard culture-based method and both LCM protocols in parallel. Blood cultures with polymicrobial growth, yeast on Gram stain, or no identification by the standard-of-care method were excluded. Concordance, diagnostic accuracy, and processing time were assessed.

Results: A total of 251 monobacterial positive blood cultures were analyzed. The SDS and Triton X-100 protocols correctly identified 62.5% and 59.8% of isolates, respectively (p = 0.52). Concordance was higher for Enterobacterales (66.7%) than for non-Enterobacterales (50.0% and 32.1%, respectively). Identification rates for Salmonella enterica were significantly lower than for other Enterobacterales (p < 0.001). Both methods required less than 15 minutes of hands-on time per sample and showed fair agreement (κ ≈ 0.31).

Conclusion: Both LCMs provided rapid, low-cost identification with comparable performance. Their utility was greater for Enterobacterales other than S. enterica, while low S. enterica identification rates limit their application for rapid enteric fever diagnosis.

Key words: Blood culture, MALDI-TOF, Sepsis, Bloodstream infection, Lysis centrifugation.

References

Rhee C, Klompas M. Sepsis trends: increasing incidence and decreasing mortality, or changing denominator? J Thorac Dis. 2020; 12(Suppl 1): S89-S100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.12.51

Cassini A, Allegranzi B, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Kortz T, Markwart R, Saito H, et al. Global report on the epidemiology and burden of sepsis: current evidence, identifying gaps and future directions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/d4ce3613-bf94-4205-85c8-14f3fc0609db/content

Qamar FN, Yousafzai MT, Dehraj IF, Shakoor S, Irfan S, Hotwani A, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in typhoidal Salmonella: surveillance for Enteric Fever in Asia Project, 2016-2019. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71(Suppl 3): S276-S284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1323

Rhee C, Kadri SS, Dekker JP, Danner RL, Chen HC, Fram D, et al. Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens in culture-proven sepsis and outcomes associated with inadequate and broad-spectrum empiric antibiotic use. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(4): e202899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2899

Duncan CF, Youngstein T, Kirrane MD, Lonsdale DO. Diagnostic challenges in sepsis. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2021; 23(12): 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-021-00765-y

Peri AM, Harris PNA, Paterson DL. Culture-independent detection systems for bloodstream infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022; 28(2): 195-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.08.010

Yo CH, Shen YH, Hsu WT, Mekary RA, Chen ZR, Lee WTJ, et al. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry rapid pathogen identification and outcomes of patients with bloodstream infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Biotechnol. 2022; 15(10): 2667-2682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14124

Nomura F, Tsuchida S, Murata S, Satoh M, Matsushita K. Mass spectrometry-based microbiological testing for bloodstream infection. Clin Proteomics. 2020; 17: 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-020-09278-7

Forster J, Kohlmorgen B, Haas J, Weis P, Breunig L, Turnwald D, et al. A streamlined method for the fast and cost-effective detection of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures for the BacT/ALERT blood culture system using the Vitek MS mass spectrometer. PLoS One. 2022; 17(4): e0267669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267669

Samaranayake WAMP, Dempsey S, Howard-Jones AR, Outhred AC, Kesson AM. Rapid direct identification of positive paediatric blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS technology and its clinical impact in the paediatric hospital setting. BMC Res Notes. 2020; 13: 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05253-5

Simon L, Ughetto E, Gaudart A, Degand N, Lotte R, Ruimy R. Direct identification of 80 percent of bacteria from blood culture bottles by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry using a 10-minute extraction protocol. J Clin Microbiol. 2019; 57(2): e01278-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01278-18

Pan HW, Li W, Li RG, Li Y, Zhang Y, Sun EH. Simple sample preparation method for direct microbial identification and susceptibility testing from positive blood cultures. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9: 481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00481

Yonetani S, Ohnishi H, Ohkusu K, Matsumoto T, Watanabe T. Direct identification of microorganisms from positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS using an in-house saponin method. Int J Infect Dis. 2016; 52: 37-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2016.09.016

Azrad M, Keness Y, Nitzan O, Pastukh N, Tkhawkho L, Freidus V, et al. Cheap and rapid in-house method for direct identification of positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS technology. BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19: 493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3709-9

Safdar N, Sultan A, Malik N, Saleem S, Nizamuddin S. An in-house technique for direct identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS. Infect Dis J Pak. 2026; 35(1): 56-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61529/idjp.v35i1.480

Tejan N, Fatima N, Yaduvanshi N, Singh R, Pathak A, Hasan I, et al. Evaluation of direct microbial identification by MALDI-TOF MS and antimicrobial susceptibility testing for early diagnosis of bloodstream infections. BMC Microbiol. 2025; 25(1): 724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04401-w

Padhy S, Priyadarshi K, Dhandapani S, Sastry AS. Accuracy of various matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-based rapid identification methods as a tool to augment diagnostic stewardship in blood culture laboratory, South India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2024; 52: 100747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100747 .

Schubert S, Weinert K, Wagner C, Gunzl B, Wieser A, Maier T, et al. Novel, improved sample preparation for rapid, direct identification from positive blood cultures using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Mol Diagn. 2011; 13(6): 701-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.06.004

Downloads

Published

30-09-2026

How to Cite

Abdul Rehman, Iftikhar, I., Batool, H., & Rasool, K. (2026). Direct identification of bacteria from positive blood culture bottles by VITEK-MS: evaluation of two lysis-centrifugation methods. Infectious Diseases Journal of Pakistan, 35(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.61529/idjp.v35i3.482