Comparison of colistin drop test to broth micro-dilution for the screening of colistin resistance in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative organisms

Authors

  • Rija Zehra Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi Pakistan
  • Imran Ahmed Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi Pakistan
  • Mohammad Umer Khan Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi Pakistan
  • Tooba Raheem Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi Pakistan
  • Syed Abbas Kazmi Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi Pakistan
  • Sadaf Zaka Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi Pakistan
  • Kauser Jabeen Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61529/idjp.v35i1.369

Abstract

Background: Colistin is a last-resort agent for treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. However, standard susceptibility testing methods are complex and resource-intensive. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement of the colistin drop test with the reference standard for detecting colistin resistance.

Material and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2023 at the Aga Khan University Hospital clinical laboratory, Karachi. The colistin drop test was evaluated using three solutions: one prepared from colistin powder and two from elution of colistin and polymyxin B disks. Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli, Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical samples (January–December 2022) were included. All methods were compared with breakpoint BMD; discrepant isolates were confirmed by reference BMD and categorized as intermediate or resistant according to CLSI guidelines.

Results: Out of 190 isolates, 85 (44.8%) were colistin-resistant and 105 (55.2%) intermediates by breakpoint BMD. Categorical agreement for colistin powder, colistin disk, and polymyxin disk methods was 97%, 95%, and 98%, respectively. Corresponding positive predictive values were 100%, 95%, and 100%; negative predictive values 96%, 96%, and 97%; sensitivity 95%, 96%, and 96%; and specificity 100%, 96%, and 100%.

Conclusion: Study findings align with previous research. The colistin drop test using polymyxin B disk solution showed optimal performance and offers a simple, reliable method for detecting colistin resistance in Gram-negative organisms in resource-limited settings.

Keywords: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Colistin drop test (CT-DT), Colistin resistance screening, Colistin susceptibility testing

References

Kang CI, Song JH. Antimicrobial resistance in Asia: current epidemiology and clinical implications. Infect Chemother. 2013;45(1):22-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2013.45.1.22

Bilal H, Khan MN, Rehman T, Hameed MF, Yang X. Antibiotic resistance in Pakistan: a systematic review of past decade. BMC Infect Dis. 2021; 21(1): 244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-05906-1

Lee K, Kim MN, Kim JS, Hong HL, Kang JO, Shin JH, et al. Further increases in carbapenem-, amikacin-, and fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa in Korea: KONSAR study 2009. Yonsei Med J. 2011;52(5):793-802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.5.793

Hassan J, El-Gemayel L, Bashour I, Kassem II. On the edge of a precipice: The global emergence and dissemination of plasmid-borne mcr genes that confer resistance to colistin, a last-resort antibiotic. In: Hashmi MZ, editor. Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in the Environment. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. p. 155-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818882-8.00010-3

Petrosillo N, Taglietti F, Granata G. Treatment Options for Colistin Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: Present and Future. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(7): 934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070934

Poirel L, Jayol A, Nordmann P. Polymyxins: Antibacterial activity, susceptibility testing, and resistance mechanisms encoded by plasmids or chromosomes. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017; 30(2): 557-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00064-16

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI supplement M100. 33rd ed. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2023. Available from: https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m100/

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 10.0, 2020. Available from: https://www.eucast.org

Sujatha SR DR, Tejashree A, Sai S. Evaluation of Colistin broth disk elution and colistin agar test: A study from tertiary care hospital, South India. J Pure Appl Microbiol 2022; 16(2): 885-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.16.2.08

Varela NP, Friendship R, Dewey C, Valdivieso A. Comparison of agar dilution and E-test for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter coil isolates recovered from 80 Ontario swine farms. Can J Vet Res. 2008; 72(2): 168-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00064-16

Ahmed I, Laiq S, Shaheen N, Wahab K, Farooqi J, Shahid A, et al. 'Breakpoint broth microdilution plate' for susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacilli against colistin sulfate. Pract Lab Med. 2020; 22: e00192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00192

Mitton B, Kingsburgh C, Kock MM, Mbelle NM, Strydom K. Evaluation of an In-House Colistin NP Test for Use in Resource-Limited Settings. J Clin Microbiol. 2019; 57(10): e00501-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00501-19

Halling SM, Jensen AE, Olsen SC. Defensin susceptibility and colonization in the mouse model of AJ100, a polymyxin B-resistant, Brucella abortus RB51 isolate. Curr Microbiol. 2008; 56(3): 274-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-007-9074-8

Jouy E, Haenni M, Le Devendec L, Le Roux A, Châtre P, Madec JY, et al. Improvement in routine detection of colistin resistance in E. coli isolated in veterinary diagnostic laboratories. J Microbiol Methods. 2017; 132: 125-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.11.017

Pasteran F, Danze D, Menocal A, Cabrera C, Castillo I, Albornoz E, et al. Simple phenotypic tests to improve accuracy in screening chromosomal and plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 2020; 59(1): e01701-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01701-20

Suay-García B, Pérez-Gracia MT. Present and future of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) Infections. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019; 8(3):122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8030122

Legenza L, McNair K, Gao S, Lacy JP, Olson BJ, Fritsche TR, et al. A geospatial approach to identify patterns of antibiotic susceptibility at a neighborhood level in Wisconsin, United States. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):7122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33895-5

Perez LRR, Carniel E, Narvaez GA, Dias CG. Evaluation of a polymyxin drop test for polymyxin resistance detection among non-fermentative gram-negative rods and enterobacterales resistant to carbapenems. APMIS. 2021; 129(3): 138-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13096

Downloads

Published

30-03-2026

How to Cite

Zehra, R., Ahmed, I., Umer Khan, M., Raheem, T., Abbas Kazmi, S., Zaka, S., & Jabeen, K. (2026). Comparison of colistin drop test to broth micro-dilution for the screening of colistin resistance in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative organisms . Infectious Diseases Journal of Pakistan, 35(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.61529/idjp.v35i1.369